Following the thread at https://voidchan.net/void/res/69844.html , it's been made rather clear that the staff, or at least a staff member, do not/does not have a definition for rule 6, and thus considers said rule unenforceable.7 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
Naturally, an undefined rule is rather worthless. Personally, I consider the term 'harassment' fairly clean, especially given the context of rule 6. The clause on cross-thread, cross-board harassment suggests as I see it a common definition for harassment of repeated and unprovoked hostile contact, eg going into any thread someone makes and telling them to kill themselves.
But, I am, of course, not staff.
I would suggest if there is so grand a confusion as to prohibit enforcement of any kind on the matter, then either the rule needs receive a clarification, as with #4 or #8, or failing that, as it's evidently useless in its current form, be removed.
An unenforceable rule, after all, only creates confusion.
No.427[Go to top]
While I understand the penchant for sitting and waiting, it's done fuck-all.
Your attempts to solve it socially are clearly not working, if such attempts were even made.
He's still pulling the usual autistic shit, including the multi post thread sliding he does.
Frankly, I'm quite tired of it.
I get he's Mikie's pal, for some unknowable reason, but that shouldn't get a perpetual shield of coverage.
He can't hold his spaghetti, and needs a time out box whenever he misbehaves. It isn't particularly complex.
No.428[Go to top]
And if you're wondering what I'm meaning here, we've 15 new threads created because of this childlike fit he's thrown, 13 of which, filling the first page, are unspoiled gay porn.
How the hell am I supposed to invite anyone here when this is a regular occurrence?
It ain't even unexpected at this point. Practically happens every week.
No.430[Go to top]
I was asleep. There was nothing I could do about it at the time. It's taken care of now.