/void/ - The Void

"Women in the UK are suffering injuries and other health problems as a result of the growing popularity of anal sex among straight couples, two NHS [British National Health Service] surgeons have warned. The consequences include [fecal] incontinence and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) as well as pain and bleeding because they have experienced bodily trauma while engaging in the practice, the doctors write in an article in the British Medical Journal. Tabitha Gana and Lesley Hunt also argued that doctors’ reluctance to discuss the risks associated with anal sex was leading to women being harmed by the practice and letting down a generation of women who are not aware of the potential problems."
… "National Survey of Sexual Attitudes research undertaken in Britain has found that the proportion of 16- to 24-year-olds engaging in heterosexual anal intercourse has risen from 12.5% to 28.5% over recent decades. Similarly, in the US 30% to 45% of both sexes have experienced it. “It is no longer considered an extreme behaviour but increasingly portrayed as a prized and pleasurable experience,” wrote Hunt, a surgeon in Sheffield, and Gana, a trainee colorectal surgeon in Yorkshire."
"Many doctors, though, especially GPs and hospital doctors, are reluctant to talk to women about the risks involved, partly because they do not want to seem judgmental or homophobic, they add. “However, with such a high proportion of young women now having anal sex, failure to discuss it when they present with anorectal symptoms exposes women to missed diagnoses, futile treatments and further harm arising from a lack of medical advice,” the surgeons said. NHS patient information about the risks of anal sex is incomplete because it only cites STIs, and makes “no mention of anal trauma, [fecal] incontinence or the psychological aftermath of the coercion young women report in relation to this activity”. Health professionals’ disinclination to discuss the practice openly with patients “may be failing a generation of young women, who are unaware of the risks”."
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/aug/11/rise-in-popularity-of-anal-sex-has-led-to-health-problems-for-women
[The article text was edited slightly to condense what was quoted into fewer lines.]

>>107574
> Why are these matters going unaddressed for so many years?
Far too many people simply do not wish to think about covered topics. It seems as if no one wants to listen even when censorship is not a factor.
> I will however look in from time to time, and _may_ respond to actually relevant posts from others (i.e. nothing about me, among other red herrings).
I've changed my mind. This is a futile endeavor. The site administration can delete this thread if they wish.

Hey virgin, the problem isn't that any of these whores had their asses expanded, it's that they're your typical retarded foid and picked the least considerate man possible to do it. Furthermore, it is hilarious every time thots get checked or audited in any capacity.

Included for reference is a fronthole-obsessed thot and the obvious trauma she has caused her pussy.

I like how older virgins are trying to turn sex, no matter the form or way, into some kind of great act of a scandalous crime.
A lot of people have sex every day and guess what. They don't care about crap like this. They don't care about what hole you put it in.
On the other hand there are a lot of sex-less people here on the internet with great interests in the scandalous points you are bringing up so you will always get a lot of support here in this crazy, imaginary world of zeroes and ones.

>>107824
> This is a futile endeavor.
Case in point: People aren't even paying attention to (or are purposely ignoring) what's written in the OP image. As I pointed out countless times before, including in two previous threads of mine here: Ultimately this is not about me.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220730055004/https://voidchan.net/void/res/80036.html
https://archive.today/20221012044227/https://voidchan.net/void/res/86150.html [Strangely not archived on archive.org for some reason: snapshot(s) deleted? I probably did try to archive it there multiple times.]

From the OP image…
Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics:
• A red herring is a tangential topic introduced intentionally as a distraction or inadvertently. Trying to create an unrelated discussion about a messenger or claimant (e.g. by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions) is one _very_ common example.
• An ad hominem logical fallacy involves arguing or implying that some supposed attribute(s) of a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics can be relevant: For example, it may be appropriate to question someone's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, a better idea may be to mention the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy, i.e. favoring some personal anecdote(s) over evidence based on science and logic.)
• Misrepresentation—introducing a distorted version of something—is another means of creating a diversion. Attacking a fabrication in order to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation featuring one or more vague, sweeping claims without proof may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant.)

It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to draw attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them. It is very likely that pornography industries utilize psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents when some pornography companies already make use of them for perpetration of violence against one or more others.

AdultDVDTalk's Porn Pool currently doesn't have quite so many anal-focused threads on the first page compared to what's shown in the image, but that could of course change. Anyway:
>>107852
>Reddit /r/painal
Other subreddits which obviously violate Reddit's policy* regarding violent content yet strangely still [as of 2023/05/15] persist nonetheless: /r/Roughanal /r/DegradingHoles /r/analfisting

* "Do not post content that encourages, glorifies, incites, or calls for violence or physical harm against an individual (including oneself) or a group of people"
https://web.archive.org/web/20230509093300/https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043513151

(Also relevant: "Note that health misinformation, namely falsifiable health information that encourages or poses a significant risk of physical harm to the reader, also violates the Rule.")

For far too many years now the subreddits mentioned above have been encouraging, glorifying, and inciting some violent behaviors—particularly anorectal violence—that should easily constitute severely criminal behavior when more than one person is involved (at the very least for potentially-lethal outcomes/sequelae). People at high levels of Reddit must be held accountable: not only for failing to uphold their own site's policies, but also for enabling the spread of violent crime along with dangerously false information facilitating it on subreddits such as /r/sex.

>>107574
To answer my own question, I expect that people will need a catalyst. I'm hoping that one or more victims on the receiving end of (what should easily be considered criminal) anorectal violence at the hands of one or more others will flip out at some point and dispense justice by way of a bloodbath.

Perhaps history has even demonstrated that important issues swept under the rug for far too long need such a catalyst before many people worldwide decide to actually do something effective. (This is speculation, hence the "perhaps;" I have no desire to dig up proof.)

>greatest contributors to decadence

I don't know about that.

>>107574
Full "decadence" paste from the OP image…

Erotic anorectal violence—anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration—is both rampant and one of the greatest contributors to societal decadence today:
• Due to its ubiquity in pornography, several generations now have grown up masturbating to, demanding more of, and seeking to emulate violent behavior that should easily be considered severely criminal when more than one person is involved. Perpetrators of this violence against one or more others going unpunished is a major problem, as is incriminating evidence being sold for profit. Those perpetrators are rewarded, encouraged, and celebrated when they should instead face justice and be condemned.
• Widespread apathy, (often willful) ignorance, and misinformation about anorectal anatomy, physiology, and health are enabling people with (self-)destructive tendencies to have a field day with such violence and to effectively spread disinformation. That unrestrained hedonism is contributing greatly to societal decay. Far too many people neither wish to think about nor seriously discuss anorectal matters, so rampant anorectal violence and its consequences "fly under the radar;" people would much rather focus on some other (in many cases far less dangerous) kind of erotic abuse.
• Widespread ignorance of what a human anus is even supposed to look like makes it an easy target for those who like to mutilate body parts. Although the anus is one of our most important body parts, typically it is very under-valued. It commonly is denigrated and intentionally harmed, a situation that is tolerated—or at least ignored—by far too many people. As the vast majority of humanity likely never will care much at least about another person's anus, discouraging anoreceptive activities entirely is the only realistic solution.

Rampant anorectal violence is caused by—and in turn contributes back to—societal decadence; this is called a positive feedback loop.
>>107855
Doubt all you wish. I am 100% certain. Far too many people really, _really_ don't wish to think about covered topics despite their importance. I expect that many people will be forced to think about these matters at some point, precisely because they avoided doing so for far too damn long. Like I said, though, I expect that they'll need a catalyst (or more than one).

"Objectives: This study explores how young women learn about anal sex and the sources of information they use, with a particular focus on information received from health care providers.
Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with 29 young women aged 18–24 who reported any lifetime experience of anal intercourse. Interviews lasted up to 90 min and were audio-recorded, transcribed, verified and coded in ATLAS.ti. Themes related to sources of information, sex education, and perceptions and conversations with health care providers about anal sex were explored.
Results: Young women described a dearth of information about anal sex gained via formal avenues, such as school education or health care providers, and relied more on information accessed through informal channels. These information sources included those gained passively from friends, partners, pornography or erotica, or information they accessed through the internet (e.g., health-related websites and web-video channels). Very few women reported ever having spoken with a health care provider about it; most said it had not come up, and had perceptions that clinicians were not interested in or comfortable with discussing matters related to sex beyond pregnancy risk.
Conclusions: Anal sex is a common sexual practice among heterosexual women but remains a taboo topic for discussion or education even in arenas where such discussion belongs. This leaves many young women unaware of the risks associated with anal sex and of how to protect themselves. Both educational and health care settings should offer young women reliable information about anal sex."
"“Never anything about anal sex whatsoever”: young women’s reflections on sources of information about anal sex." Contraception. 2017 Oct; 96(4): 303. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.151.
[The abstract quoted above is from a PDF with multiple abstracts obtained from Sci-Hub by entering the DOI. The journal's site arrived at via https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.151 doesn't even offer the entire abstract without paying or having institutional access.]

>>107856


I think there are a lot of other contributors to decadency other than anal sex. If anything, I believe the two can be mutually exclusive to one another. I don't think of decadency when I think of anal sex; not that it can't be, but the same can apply to oral sex, vaginal, a quality handjob, use of the thighs, feet for some, or any other part of the body. That doesn't take into account many acts that may not even have anything to do with the anal region of the groin.

Further more, the first article paints a picture of anal sex being some dangerous sexual act that will inevitably lead to injury, disease, or some other form of harm, when in reality sex is dangerous as a whole; yet you don't hear the words "Rampant vaginal violence" or "Wide spread ignorance of the what the throat is even supposed to look like."

I actually work within the field of medicine and can tell you that vaginal infections and injuries are more common than people like to believe. The same to applies to the penis and testicles. Sexually transmitted disease is also rather common among people whether you're using a mouth, pussy, ass, or cock. One of the topics we have to study on is STD's and the act of sex.

In the longevity of it all simply isn't that big an issue in any regard; even less so when two consenting adults are taking the necessary steps to practice safe sex in both the transmittable department, as well as the physical aspects of restraint as to not accidentally hurt your partner. Unless you like pain or something. I'm not going to kink shame someone for that. Much. That covers the physical portions of it seems to me that you have a moral stand point against it, which is fine. That is your opinion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_f-I2pklhEA

I'd also like to point out that decadence can take form in more than just our perverse and carnal desires; food, wealth, drug use, and lavish life style all can be seen as a path towards decadence and excess. Even sloth and lazing about can be a form of such luxuries and pleasures in life. Anal sex is simply one single aspect that not everyone participates in.

Some of the other articles that are posted are simply bizarre and outlandish. For example: psychopathy and anal sex, which it doesn't even really pin point on the act of anal sex itself.

This is vaguely reminiscent of Tipper Gore's movement for the banning of Heavy Metal music due to sexually explicit and violent lyrics somehow translating to acts of violence and sexual violence. There is no actual correlation. Considering there are a lot of people in America alone who have tried anal sex at least once and a considerable amount of those who enjoyed it, you would think that society would be a lot more fucked than it really is at the moment.

I think things like poverty, excessive street drug use, greed, bad parenting, and unhealthy life choices are far larger contributors to the evils of the world.

One more thing, when it comes to sex, sadism and masochism; much like explicit lyrics, violent and sexual video games, works of fiction and the likes; most adults are actually pretty good about separating fantasy from reality and working them in the bedroom.

If anything I would blame the expansive world of technology and human beings forgetting how to socialize with human beings to be a bigger disconnect than sticking your dick in someone's butt.

>>107859
> I think there are a lot of other contributors to decadency other than anal sex.
1. Nothing I wrote contradicts that. I pointed out that anorectal violence is _one of_ the greatest contributors to societal decadence.
2. I defined and wrote specifically about anorectal violence, not "anal sex" (which is a vague term that I try to avoid using).
> the same can apply to oral sex, vaginal, a quality handjob, use of the thighs, feet for some, or any other part of the body.
One, those are red herrings. Two, they aren't really comparable unless violence (i.e., injurious behavior) is involved. Three, people tend to care about and highly value at least the external appearance and health of the vulva; not so much for the anus and perianal skin: I wrote in the OP image about common prejudices against and denigration of the anus along with rampant, anus-mutilating erotic anorectal violence. Far too many people do not even seem to recognize anorectal violence as _being_ violence (whether that's due to ignorance, apathy, malice, or some combination) with all of the implications that descriptor should invoke.
> the first article paints a picture of anal sex being some dangerous sexual act that will inevitably lead to injury, disease, or some other form of harm
Anal intercourse is very likely to cause significant injury because of many people not being aware of (or not caring about, or worse still BEING MISINFORMED ABOUT) the traumatic risks in particular along with anorectal anatomy and physiology. That is due to numerous factors I mentioned in the "decadence" paste: 1) "[anorectal violence's] ubiquity in pornography, [with] several generations now [having] grown up masturbating to, demanding more of, and seeking to emulate violent behavior"; 2) "perpetrators [being] rewarded, encouraged, and celebrated when they should instead face justice and be condemned"; 3) "Widespread apathy, (often willful) ignorance, and misinformation about anorectal anatomy, physiology, and health"; and 4) "Widespread ignorance of what a human anus is even supposed to look like makes it an easy target for those who like to mutilate body parts. Although the anus is one of our most important body parts, typically it is very under-valued. It commonly is denigrated and intentionally harmed, a situation that is tolerated—or at least ignored—by far too many people."
> I actually work within the field of medicine
People can and do make all sorts of claims online (and there are plenty of people out there who willingly engage in deceit and manipulation, one characteristic of psychopathy in the absence of a conscience and remorse), so perhaps you'll understand why I take your claim with a grain of salt. Besides, the field of medicine is quite varied; unless you specialize in anorectal subjects, working in the medical field might not even make you vaguely authoritative on those topics.

>>107859
Rampant anorectal violence most certainly is a major issue. That should be abundantly clear from what I posted. I do not lightly make the claim that "Erotic anorectal violence—anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration—is […] one of the greatest contributors to societal decadence today."
> even less so when two consenting adults are taking the necessary steps to practice safe sex in both the transmittable department, as well as the physical aspects of restraint as to not accidentally hurt your partner.
It should be exceedingly obvious from what I posted that many people can't really make informed choices about anoreceptive activities due to "Widespread apathy, (often willful) ignorance, and misinformation about anorectal anatomy, physiology, and health" along with "people with (self-)destructive tendencies [having] a field day […] effectively spread[ing] disinformation."
> Unless you like pain or something.
Some people do: There is a very good reason why I included quotes about sexual masochism disorder in Trends & Associations.
> That covers the physical portions of it
No, it doesn't. It should be clear from reading and understanding the traumatic risks summary I wrote that significant damage can occur to a receptive person's anorectum with no pain sensations whatsoever. Furthermore, the human anorectum is much more fragile than the human vagina (see what I quoted from PMC3403474, included in Anorectal Risks 2).
> seems to me that you have a moral stand point against it, which is fine. That is your opinion.
Yet again: Ultimately this is not about me. There are many good, non-opinion-based reasons why many people ought to both oppose rampant anorectal violence and seriously and effectively address factors facilitating it. There also is plenty of material I posted that does not constitute opinion, but rather fact.
>>107861
> most adults are actually pretty good about separating fantasy from reality
I posted plenty of evidence to the contrary. It should be clear why many people are unable to separate fantasy from reality especially when it comes to anoreceptive activities due to those facilitating factors I mentioned.

>>107862
Greatest contributor is a large statement to make when talking about something as board as decadence. There is absolutely zero proof that anal sex is a large contributor than any other source of addiction or luxury.
>I defined and wrote specifically about anorectal violence, not anal sex
What's the difference? Because I saw you write and post a lot about anal in about 10 different posts.
>One, those are red herrings. Two, they aren't really comparable unless violence (i.e., injurious behavior) is involved.
I don't think you know what a red herring is because they aren't. And two, if we are talking about actual injury, the amount of acts in anal sex where the recipient isn't harmed is significantly higher than those in which they are.
>Anal intercourse is very likely to cause significant injury because of many people not being aware of (or not caring about, or worse still BEING MISINFORMED ABOUT) the traumatic risks in particular along anything about anal sex leading to all of these behavioral and physical health problems. That would be a in the heat of the moment injury due to lack of information, something avoidable while still being in the possibility of indulging in safely.
>Rampant anorectal violence most certainly is a major issue. That should be abundantly clear from what I posted. I do not lightly make the claim that "Erotic anorectal violence—anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration—is […] one of the greatest contributors to societal decadence today."
Again, there's no real way to prove that it is a contributor in the first place. It's the same logic that falls under violent video games and religious arguments about masturbation.
>Furthermore, the human anorectum is much more fragile than the human vagina (
You know that they are made from the same tissue materials right? The vagina is naturally more inclined to be flexible and stretchy for obvious reasons, but just like the vagina can adjust quite easily. Hell even your stomach can stretch fool.

>It should be clear why many people are unable to separate fantasy from reality especially
Bingo. There it is. There's the root of it all. This is a cynics perspective on humanity and your own projections of self control onto it. No, you retard; most people are actually extremely good about it.


What you're describing and implying is that literal butthurt can change people for the worst. Truly the most compelling of anime backstory.

>>107867
> There is absolutely zero proof that anal sex is a large contributor [to societal decadence]
That is not so, as my "decadence" paste should explain quite sufficiently especially when considering all of the evidence I've provided. I call it my _decadence_ paste for a reason. When considering at least all of the evidence I've posted (I have plenty more), it is exceedingly obvious that rampant anorectal violence is a major contributor to societal decay nowadays.
> What's the difference?
Some people use the term "anal sex" to refer to a variety of anoreceptive activities, e.g. anilingus, and so it can be vague. That is why I defined and wrote specifically about anorectal violence.
> I don't think you know what a red herring is because they aren't.
Yes, they are. This thread is quite obviously about anorectal eroticism and not any other kind of erotic behavior.
> if we are talking about actual injury, the amount of acts in anal sex where the recipient isn't harmed is significantly higher than those in which they are.
1. You're still using that vague term.
2. As I wrote in the OP image: The burden of proof rests on the claimant. I posted evidence (e.g. the article from The Guardian, not to mention the ABC.Net.Au article in Trends & Associations) that many receptive people are experiencing injury as a result of anoreceptive activities, particularly anal intercourse. That should hardly be surprising considering those facilitating factors I mentioned along with plenty of evidence I provided.
> You know that they are made from the same tissue materials right?
This is included in Anorectal Risks 3:
"The rectal epithelium is an absorptive tissue with a delicate simple columnar epithelium. In sharp contrast, the human vagina is lined by a multilayered stratified squamous epithelium designed for the strain that can occur during sexual intercourse and childbirth."
"Relative Safety of Sexual Lubricants for Rectal Intercourse." Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2004 Jun; 31(6): 346-9. doi:10.1097/00007435-200406000-00005. (PMID 15167643)

> Your request looks automated; Post discarded.
Grr. Let's try another IP address…
>>107867
> This is a cynics perspective on humanity and your own projections of self control onto it. No, you retard; most people are actually extremely good about it.
This is included in Trends & Associations:
"Pornography has become a primary source of sexual education. At the same time, mainstream commercial pornography has coalesced around a relatively homogenous script involving violence and female degradation. Yet, little work has been done exploring the associations between pornography and dyadic sexual encounters: What role does pornography play inside real-world sexual encounters between a man and a woman? Cognitive script theory argues media scripts create a readily accessible heuristic model for decision-making. The more a user watches a particular media script, the more embedded those codes of behavior become in their worldview and the more likely they are to use those scripts to act upon real life experiences. We argue pornography creates a sexual script that then guides sexual experiences. To test this, we surveyed 487 college men (ages 18-29 years) in the United States to compare their rate of pornography use with sexual preferences and concerns. Results showed the more pornography a man watches, the more likely he was to use it during sex, request particular pornographic sex acts of his partner, [and] deliberately conjure images of pornography during sex to maintain arousal…"
"Pornography and the Male Sexual Script: An Analysis of Consumption and Sexual Relations." Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2016 May; 45(4): 983-94. PMID 25466233. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0391-2.

Furthermore, I mentioned numerous contributing factors in my "decadence" paste: 1) Widespread apathy, (often willful) ignorance, and misinformation about anorectal anatomy, physiology, and health 2) People with (self-)destructive tendencies having a field day with anorectal violence effectively spreading disinformation. There are more factors that play a significant role as well, such as the Coolidge effect, trendiness (e.g. "Everyone's doing it!" "It's the cool thing to do!" "I want to try what I saw in porn!"), peer pressure, normalization of coercion, pornography giving people warped expectations, etc.

Cum

>>107869
>>107868

https://youtu.be/3-nH2pcORKY?t=15
What you're posting is hardly evidence at all. (It isn't.)

>Yes, they are. This thread is quite obviously about anorectal eroticism and not any other kind of erotic behavior.
Correct, but it it is important to bring context to anal sex and one way to do that is to bring to light a completely normal behavior in the bed room. Anal sex is the act in question and it isn't unreasonable to put it next to a 'control'.

>"Pornography has become a primary source of sexual education."
That's a statement alright. One that I really have a hard time believing.

>What role does pornography play inside real-world sexual encounters between a man and a woman?
I thought we were talking about anal violence or whatever, not porn. According to you, that is a red herring in of itself.

>>107889
I posted plenty of evidence, i.e. quotes from many books, peer-reviewed studies, and articles. The OP images references my "Anorectal Trends, Risks, and Anatomy compilation" made up of named quote collections (Trends & Associations, Anatomy & Trauma, Anorectal Risks 1-3, and Prolapse & Incontinence), some of which I've posted individually as images. As I wrote in >>107868 I have plenty more in addition to what is contained within those. I may post more here in the near future (I'm thinking about creating an "additional sources" image, although posting material as text may be better).
> That's a statement alright. One that I really have a hard time believing.
That's far from being the only source making such an assertion. Several articles and other studies quoted in Trends & Associations point out that many people are being influenced by, and even copying, what they see in pornography.
> I thought we were talking about anal violence or whatever, not porn. According to you, that is a red herring in of itself.
Not so: Pornography is quite relevant, as I mentioned it in my "decadence" paste at the very top of the OP image. Pornography undeniably is a major driving force behind the popularity and normalization of anorectal eroticism, inclusive of anorectal violence.
> it it is important to bring context to anal sex and one way to do that is to bring to light a completely normal behavior in the bed room.
1. As I pointed out previously several times to you, the term "anal sex" can be vague.
2. Violent anoreceptive activities are quite common due to those facilitating factors I mentioned. There is plenty of evidence (including articles and studies I've quoted) that many receptive people are experiencing health consequences from such activities. As I wrote previously: >>107868
> I posted evidence (e.g. the article from The Guardian, not to mention the ABC.Net.Au article in Trends & Associations) that many receptive people are experiencing injury as a result of anoreceptive activities, particularly anal intercourse. That should hardly be surprising considering those facilitating factors I mentioned along with plenty of evidence I provided.
Further: >>107863
> It should be exceedingly obvious from what I posted that many people can't really make informed choices about anoreceptive activities due to "Widespread apathy, (often willful) ignorance, and misinformation about anorectal anatomy, physiology, and health" along with "people with (self-)destructive tendencies [having] a field day […] effectively spread[ing] disinformation."

>>107909
> I posted plenty of evidence, i.e. quotes from many books, peer-reviewed studies, and articles. The OP images references my "Anorectal Trends, Risks, and Anatomy compilation" made up of named quote collections (Trends & Associations, Anatomy & Trauma, Anorectal Risks 1-3, and Prolapse & Incontinence), some of which I've posted individually as images.
My bad: In >>107868 I was talking specifically about evidence for 1) rampant anorectal violence being a major contributor to societal decay nowadays, and 2) many receptive people experiencing injury as a result of anoreceptive activities, particularly anal intercourse. Most, but not all, such evidence is contained within the Trends & Associations quote collection.

Anyway, points 1 and 2 are related. As the study quoted in >>107857 points out, "Anal sex is a common sexual practice among heterosexual women but remains a taboo topic for discussion or education even in arenas where such discussion belongs. This leaves many young women unaware of the risks associated with anal sex and of how to protect themselves." I wrote in another paste of mine not yet posted here that "far too many people do not wish to think seriously about anorectal matters even though the anus is one of our most important body parts." Health consequences of anorectal violence may frequently be brushed off as insignificant or even suppressed. Moreover, not all health consequences of that violence may be immediately obvious (or at least acknowledged by the person experiencing one or more of them).

Material of relevance:
"Fewer than 50 % of women with urinary incontinence (UI) and 30 % of women with accidental bowel leakage (ABL) seek care."
"Barriers to seeking care for accidental bowel leakage: a qualitative study." International Urogynecology Journal. 2017 Apr; 28(4): 543-551. doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3195-1. (PMID 27844123)

"Fecal incontinence is very common but because of the associated embarrassment and a common taboo nature, it is under-reported and its true prevalence difficult to reliably assess. Reported estimates of prevalence rates always have to be interpreted with caution and should be seen within their respective context."
"Fecal incontinence - Challenges and solutions." World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017 Jan 7; 23(1): 11-24. PMC5221273. doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i1.11.

You're posting arguments for physical harm rather than of decadence itself in many cases, and presenting it as the biggest contributor as such. Your "evidence" is all over the place and you skip from point to point that often have nothing to do with one another. Additionally, if you want to be taken seriously you're going to need actually voice your own thoughts and points clearly instead of spewing quotes, numbers, and verbatim. It comes off as a text wall designed to confuse and spin narrative rather than actually discuss whatever it is you're trying to convey at this point.

Evidence of physical harm is not evidence of decedance. The two do not go hand in hand.

Correlation =/= causation.

Your links are hardly credible; the very first one is a good example. It was a survey conducted at a Universe with college students and a handful of about 1000 people. More than likely like minded individuals. 13% of those who use porn daily said they had depression, axiety, or stress which means nothing as far as cause.
Those numbers could also be a narrative that porn is a way to relieve stress rather than cause it considering 87% of those same people questioned are living healthy stress free lives. There is no clarification.

Further more it isn't actually a credible publication.


Additionally: there's nothing wrong with curiosity and experimentation assuming all parties present are consenting adults. Natural stretching isn't mutilation; it's stretching to adjust. That's like saying working out is mutilation because it causes micro tears in your arms and legs.
>As I pointed out previously several times to you, the term "anal sex" can be vague.
Your vagueness needs to be clarified because Anal Violence is pretty vague. Otherwise your point isn't very clear.

My verdict: You are a faggot. Please kill yourself.

>>107916
> "you" so many times (along with "your" & "you're")
From previous posts of mine: Ultimately this is not about me.
From the OP image: A red herring is a tangential topic introduced intentionally as a distraction or inadvertently. Trying to create an unrelated discussion about a messenger or claimant (e.g. by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions) is one _very_ common example.
Also from the OP image: It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to draw attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them.
> Evidence of physical harm is not evidence of decedance.
Also from the OP image: Misrepresentation—introducing a distorted version of something—is another means of creating a diversion. Attacking a fabrication in order to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy.

In >>107868 I wrote: When considering at least all of the evidence I've posted (I have plenty more), it is exceedingly obvious that rampant anorectal violence is a major contributor to societal decay nowadays.
> Further more it isn't actually a credible publication.
1) I quoted many sources. 2) Again from the OP image: An ad hominem logical fallacy involves arguing or implying that some supposed attribute(s) of a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant
> Your vagueness needs to be clarified because Anal Violence is pretty vague.
In >>107862 I pointed out that I defined and wrote specifically about anorectal violence.

>>107859
> I actually work within the field of medicine
>>107867
> [Quoting >>107862 Furthermore, the human anorectum is much more fragile than the human vagina]
> You know that they are made from the same tissue materials right?
>>107868
> This is included in Anorectal Risks 3:
> "The rectal epithelium is an absorptive tissue with a delicate simple columnar epithelium. In sharp contrast, the human vagina is lined by a multilayered stratified squamous epithelium designed for the strain that can occur during sexual intercourse and childbirth."
> "Relative Safety of Sexual Lubricants for Rectal Intercourse." Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2004 Jun; 31(6): 346-9. doi:10.1097/00007435-200406000-00005. (PMID 15167643)
>>107862
> People can and do make all sorts of claims online (and there are plenty of people out there who willingly engage in deceit and manipulation, one characteristic of psychopathy in the absence of a conscience and remorse),
"Also known as psychopathy, sociopathy or dyssocial personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder (APD) [or ASPD] is a diagnosis applied to persons who routinely behave with little or no regard for the rights, safety or feelings of others. This pattern of behavior is seen in children or young adolescents and persists into adulthood."
… "People diagnosed with APD in prison populations act as if they have no conscience. They move through society as predators, paying little attention to the consequences of their actions. They cannot understand feelings of guilt or remorse. Deceit and manipulation characterize their interpersonal relationships."
https://web.archive.org/web/20171002164816/http://www.minddisorders.com/A-Br/Antisocial-personality-disorder.html

>>107869
> I mentioned numerous contributing factors in my "decadence" paste: 1) Widespread apathy, (often willful) ignorance, and misinformation about anorectal anatomy, physiology, and health 2) People with (self-)destructive tendencies having a field day with anorectal violence effectively spreading disinformation. There are more factors that play a significant role as well, such as the Coolidge effect, trendiness (e.g. "Everyone's doing it!" "It's the cool thing to do!" "I want to try what I saw in porn!"), peer pressure, normalization of coercion, pornography giving people warped expectations, etc.
Embarrassment about even discussing anorectal matters is another contributing factor.

"Anorectal disorders are very common among a wide population of patients. Because patients may be embarrassed about the anatomic location of their symptoms, they may present to care late in the course of their illness. Care should be taken to validate patient concerns and normalize fears. This article discusses the diagnoses and management of common anorectal disorders among patients presenting to a primary care physician."
"Diagnosis and Management of Anorectal Disorders in the Primary Care Setting." Primary Care. 2017 Dec; 44(4): 709-720. PMID 29132530. doi:10.1016/j.pop.2017.07.012.

"These cases illustrate the importance of careful history taking in urological patients. The sexual history needs to include direct questions about the nature of sexual activity undertaken by an individual regardless of the sexual orientation of the patient. Whilst some questions may be felt to be too embarrassing or intrusive to pose, they may reveal precipitating factors that the patient will be reluctant to volunteer. Anal intercourse, whether homosexual or heterosexual, is considered taboo by many individuals, including some who engage in it. Notably, none of the patients in our series volunteered the information."
"Anal intercourse amongst heterosexuals is common in young people,3 being practised by 24.5% of men and 22.9% of women in the age group 25–34 years in the UK,4 and is often unprotected. It is more common in young women with a non-intact family structure and lower parental education,5 but is certainly not confined to this group; indeed, 7 of the 8 patients in this series were private patients. The presentation of heterosexual anal intercourse as more socially acceptable than in the past is exemplified by its appearance and discussion in mainstream culture in the ‘Bridget Jones’ films."
"Redefining urological history taking - anal intercourse as the cause of unexplained symptoms in heterosexuals." Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2008 Jul; 90(5): 403-5. PMC2645743. doi:10.1308/003588408X301000.

"Dating violence (DV) and sexual violence (SV) are widespread problems among adolescents and emerging adults. A growing body of literature demonstrates that exposure to sexually explicit media (SEM) and sexually violent media (SVM) may be risk factors for DV and SV. The purpose of this article is to provide a systematic and comprehensive literature review on the impact of exposure to SEM and SVM on DV and SV attitudes and behaviors. A total of 43 studies utilizing adolescent and emerging adult samples were reviewed, and collectively the findings suggest that (1) exposure to SEM and SVM is positively related to DV and SV myths and more accepting attitudes toward DV and SV; (2) exposure to SEM and SVM is positively related to actual and anticipated DV and SV victimization, perpetration, and bystander nonintervention; (3) SEM and SVM more strongly impact men's DV and SV attitudes and behaviors than women's DV and SV attitudes and behaviors; and (4) preexisting attitudes related to DV and SV and media preferences moderate the relationship between SEM and SVM exposure and DV and SV attitudes and behaviors. Future studies should strive to employ longitudinal and experimental designs, more closely examine the mediators and moderators of SEM and SVM exposure on DV and SV outcomes, focus on the impacts of SEM and SVM that extend beyond men's use of violence against women, and examine the extent to which media literacy programs could be used independently or in conjunction with existing DV and SV prevention programs to enhance effectiveness of these programming efforts."
"The Impacts of Sexual Media Exposure on Adolescent and Emerging Adults' Dating and Sexual Violence Attitudes and Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Literature." Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2019 Oct; 20(4): 439-452. PMID 29333966. doi:10.1177/1524838017717745. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

Why are you posting all this on a splinter site of a splinter site? What do you hope to accomplish? A healthy debate with internet degenerates?

>>108059

>why do people on the internet do what people on the internet do?
Seems obvious doesn’t it? If they’re not doing this they’re spending their lives soy facing about AI or something.

>>108069
It's sad to put so much effort into something and then presenting it for a bunch of nihilists. My damage control is that it's an aspy who really likes writing text-walls.

>>108074
SIMON IS SANE AND RIGHT FOR A CHANGE

Yeah iv'e wondered what he hopes to accomplish too. I mean the entire site is now lizard porn and Nonny begging for attention.

Theres no one left to debate with

>>108075
> debate
The OP image is called "TAKE ACTION," and it should be obvious from the title of the thread that the goal here is to convince people to "Address rampant anorectal violence & facilitating factors."

"Overall, this meta-analysis demonstrates consistent and robust relations between media exposure and sexual attitudes and behavior spanning multiple outcome measures and multiple media. Media portray sexual behavior as highly prevalent, recreational, and relatively risk-free [3], and our analyses suggest that a viewer’s own sexual decision-making may be shaped, in part, by viewing these types of portrayals. Our findings are in direct contrast with the previous meta-analysis, which suggested that media’s impact on sexual behavior was trivial or nonexistent [4]. The previous meta-analysis used 38 effect sizes and found that “sexy” media were weakly and trivially related with sexual behavior (r = .08), whereas the current meta-analysis used more than 10 times the amount of effect sizes (n = 394) and found an effect nearly double the size (r = .14)."
"First, we found positive associations between exposure to sexual media and teens’ and young adults’ permissive sexual attitudes and perceptions of their peers’ sexual experiences. Second, exposure to sexual media content was associated with greater acceptance of common rape myths. Finally, sexual media exposure was found to predict sexual behaviors including age of sexual initiation, overall sexual experience, and risky sexual behavior. These results converged across multiple methodologies and provide support for the assertion that media contribute to the sexual experiences of young viewers."
"Although the meta-analysis demonstrated significant effects of sexual media exposure on sexual attitudes and behaviors across all variables of interest, these effects were moderated by a few variables. Most notably, significant effects for all ages were apparent; however, the effect was more than twice as large for adolescents as for emerging adults, perhaps reflecting the fact that older participants likely have more comparative, real-world experience to draw on than younger participants [36,37]. In addition, the effect was stronger for males compared with females, perhaps because sexual experimentation fits the male sexual script [18] and because male characters are punished less often than female characters for sexual initiation [38]. Finally, the effect was stronger for white participants compared with black participants. This finding aligns with expectations of social cognitive theory [6], which anticipates that black youth may identify less strongly with the predominantly white characters of mainstream media."
… "These findings have significant implications for adolescent and emerging adult physical and mental health. Perceiving high levels of peer sexual activity and sexual permissiveness may increase feelings of internal pressure to experiment sexually [39]. In one study, exposure to sexual media content in early adolescence was seen to advance sexual initiation by 9—17 months [40]; in turn, early experimentation may increase mental and physical health risks [37]."
"Contributions of Mainstream Sexual Media Exposure to Sexual Attitudes, Perceived Peer Norms, and Sexual Behavior: A Meta-Analysis." Journal of Adolescent Health. 2019 Apr; 64(4): 430-436. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.11.016. (PMID 30691937) Epub 2019 Jan 26.

>>108075
You can debate me nigga

>>108099
Another thread would be more appropriate, unless you and that other anon intend to have a serious and informed debate about relevant topics (somehow that seems unlikely).

"In seeking to understand both the formation of risky sexual scripts and the acceptance of sexual coercion, previous research has identified the use of pornography as a significant predictor of risky sexual scripts, with downstream effects on both consensual sexual behavior and sexual aggression. Pornographic material typically contains features that are considered risk factors of perpetration and vulnerability factors of victimization, such as noncommittal sex, the use of violence, and stereotypes about “token” resistance of women, that is, their tendency to reject a sexual offer despite being willing to accept it (e.g., Dines, 2010). There is plenty of evidence that exposure to pornographic media contents affects users’ sexual scripts, attitudes, and behaviors (as summarized by Coyne et al., 2019; Rodenhizer & Edwards, 2019). Furthermore, pornography use has been linked to sexual aggression perpetration, as shown in the review by Wright et al. (2016). Our studies have shown that pornography use increased the acceptance of sexual coercion (e.g., Tomaszewska & Krahé, 2016). In a longitudinal study with Dutch adolescents, Peter and Valkenberg (2010) showed that more frequent use of sexually explicit material on the internet predicted more instrumental attitudes to sex, as reflected in endorsement of statements such as “The main goal of sex is that you yourself have a good time”. These authors further showed that the association was mediated by higher perceived realism of pornography."
"Changing Cognitive Risk Factors for Sexual Aggression: Risky Sexual Scripts, Low Sexual Self-Esteem, Perception of Pornography, and Acceptance of Sexual Coercion." Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2022 Feb; 37(3-4): NP1377-NP1400. PMC8793298. doi:10.1177/0886260520922341. Epub 2020 Jun 6.

>>107917
> 1) I quoted many sources. 2) Again from the OP image: An ad hominem logical fallacy involves arguing or implying that some supposed attribute(s) of a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant
I'm somewhat unsatisfied with that response, so here's another one:
>>107916
> Correlation =/= causation
I'm well aware of that. Correlation nonetheless can be both highly suggestive of causation and a good indicator of something to investigate for a potential causative link.
> Your links are hardly credible; the very first one is a good example. It was a survey conducted at a Universe with college students and a handful of about 1000 people. More than likely like minded individuals. 13% of those who use porn daily said they had depression, axiety, or stress which means nothing as far as cause.
The first "link" (URL) in Trends & Associations is the ABC.Net.Au article. You mean the second study I quoted, PMC7835260 in the journal Frontiers in Psychology, which states in a portion I didn't quote that "17.0, 20.4, and 13.5% of students reported severe or extremely severe levels of depression, anxiety and stress, respectively, with compulsive pornography use significantly affecting all three mental health parameters in both sexes."

1) I didn't quote that study for its coverage of depression, anxiety, and stress in pornography users. 2) Concerning credibility, that particular study cites many others and currently has been cited itself by 9 studies on PubMed (full versions coincidentally all freely-available on PubMed Central, aka PMC): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?sort=date&linkname=pubmed_pubmed_citedin&from_uid=33510691 — And it appears that all of those 9 citing it thus far are doing so in a positive and not negative sense (relying on, rather than criticizing, what they cite). However, it could cite (and/or be cited by) 0 others and still be correct. Truth is not determined by credibility nor positive/negative citations — although both can be important considerations e.g. when someone is in a hurry and wants to hastily trust or distrust something (essentially gambling on belief).

>>108158
Here is what I did quote from that study:

"Initially being consumed primarily through magazines, patterns of pornography use have developed so that today, the internet is the primary medium for pornography consumption (D’Orlando, 2009). This shift has made pornography more accessible than in the past due to the anonymity, accessibility, and affordability the internet provides to the consumer (Cooper et al., 2000; Fisher and Barak, 2001; Price et al., 2016). Furthermore, the development of smartphones, and their substantial prevalence among young adults (Pew Research Center, 2015), has contributed to this ease of access to pornography (Bailin et al., 2014; Vanden Abeele et al., 2014). Reports of pornography use are diverse, with numbers varying from 19.0–78.4% in females and 40.0–79.0% in males (Carroll et al., 2008; Regnerus et al., 2016; Dwulit and Rzymski, 2019)."
… "The necessity to understand the impact of pornography is broad due to its capacity to potentially influence various fundamental elements of society, including social interaction, human relationships and their integrity (e.g., fidelity, relationship satisfaction), human behavior (e.g., isolation, loneliness), and psychological well-being (e.g., partner distress) (e.g., Charny and Parnass, 1995; Bridges et al., 2003; Maddox et al., 2011; Minarcik et al., 2016)."
"Of concern is the potential capacity for pornography to influence sexual scripts through normalizing the observed behaviors (Tsitsika et al., 2009), which may potentially be related to an increased tolerance toward or acceptance of degrading/aggressive/violent sexual behaviors including, but not limited to, rape and sexual assault (Gerger et al., 2007), among both men (Foubert et al., 2011) and women (Norris et al., 2004)."
"Compulsive Internet Pornography Use and Mental Health: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Sample of University Students in the United States." Frontiers in Psychology. 2021 Jan 12; 11: 613244. PMC7835260. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613244.

>>108098
Getting going and taking action is a very ill advised thing to do on the internet unless you can be very specific about what that action is.
It lands flat assed in the same category as hate groups and doxxing which uses the same strategy to create misery.

>>108164
1. You are welcome to your own opinions.
2. People could undertake a greater number of potential courses of action. There are plenty of intelligent people out there who should be able to come up with many good ideas. One course of action that should be quite obvious from reading the OP image is addressing those English Wikipedia articles' flaws that were documented in the Wikipedia critique.

I do not have all of the answers, nor can I force anyone to do anything; I can only try to convince people to act.

I fully expect that many people certainly will be required to seriously and effectively address issues I and others covered sooner or later. Societies worldwide (along with people, governments, and educational institutions within them) can't metaphorically sweep these matters under the rug forever. The significance of the consequences will ensure that.

>>108170
*great number

>>108170
>I fully expect that
This strategy of unsolicited posting on imageboards with calls to action has been going on for over 10 years.

It's obviously not working. In over 10 years, this has accomplished nothing. The tactic of invading communities and insisting other people do work you aren't doing yourself has shown to be ineffective, and if anything, diverted resources away from actually addressing anorectal violence whilst generating animosity towards the cause by repeatedly posting on inappropriate boards.

Imageboards are not the way forward for this movement. They've been proven beyond reasonable doubt to be a dead end. If you truly care about victims of anorectal violence, don't throw away effort by yelling into websites which pride themselves on not taking things seriously. Take action, by finding local representatives who actually care about politics and health.

>>108172
Over 15 years, actually. Here is an example of my work from 2008: https://web.archive.org/web/20080609040506/http://damon4.bravehost.com/ (earliest version archived: 20080227)
> In over 10 years, this has accomplished nothing.
That is blatantly false. I've learned plenty at the very least. I can only hope that some others have learned from this endeavor as well.
> The tactic of invading communities and insisting other people do work you aren't doing yourself has shown to be ineffective
1) That remains to be seen. 2) I've put in plenty of effort over the course of more than 15 years.
> Imageboards are not the way forward for this movement. They've been proven beyond reasonable doubt to be a dead end.
Hmm. Regardless, I pointed this out in the past elsewhere: Anyone else could take some or all of that information from others to which I've been trying to draw attention and use different tactics. One person can be expected to do only so much. Most certainly I've done plenty already.
> If you truly care about victims of anorectal violence
As I pointed out numerous times in this thread (and plenty of times elsewhere over the years): Ultimately this is not about me.
> don't throw away effort by yelling into websites which pride themselves on not taking things seriously
That may be a good point at least for this place. However, some chans do have serious discussions.
> Take action, by finding local representatives who actually care about politics and health.
I value my anonymity too much, so that's not an option. Besides, I'm uncertain that doing so would be any more effective than what I've been doing for far too many years. Far too many people just don't wish to think seriously about various topics I and others have covered.

As I wrote: I fully expect that many people certainly will be required to seriously and effectively address issues I and others covered sooner or later. Societies worldwide (along with people, governments, and educational institutions within them) can't metaphorically sweep these matters under the rug forever. The significance of the consequences will ensure that.

>>108177
Dude. We are people who enjoy hobbies intended for 12 year-olds. Even if you were to create an army here, how effective do you think that army would be?

>>107853
> >Reddit /r/painal
> Other subreddits which obviously violate Reddit's policy* regarding violent content yet strangely still [as of 2023/05/15] persist nonetheless: /r/Roughanal /r/DegradingHoles /r/analfisting
> * "Do not post content that encourages, glorifies, incites, or calls for violence or physical harm against an individual (including oneself) or a group of people"
> https://web.archive.org/web/20230509093300/https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043513151
People also could report those subreddits for being in violation of Reddit's policy for many years.
>>108185
Refer again to what I pointed out previously:
>>107852
> People aren't even paying attention to (or are purposely ignoring) what's written in the OP image. As I pointed out countless times before, including in two previous threads of mine here: Ultimately this is not about me.
> These topics [anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation], plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them.

>>108170
> One course of action that should be quite obvious from reading the OP image is addressing those English Wikipedia articles' flaws that were documented in the Wikipedia critique.
A recent change in the article about the human anus removed an unsourced claim that the anus and perineum "may darken after puberty depending on individual genetics." https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Human_anus&diff=1157064912&oldid=1157063820&u=2nbisl4uaguFUFLBoFB6f9grPOINORjLlXnmiDBcnvDkPyRneznpgDruVjgqN1dHibB9Z9LFESVvssualdgKjxOieDEazoMRS00I03n8zSgBiC7AtJyAwng1z2ON

That probably wasn't accurate about the anus and perineum anyway. However, as I noted in the OP image concerning the skin surrounding the anus: "Healthy perianal skin commonly has a different, typically darker, color due to physiologic hyperpigmentation" (one reference for that is found in Anatomy & Trauma: Genital Dermatology Atlas (2010) - Page 228). The same darker coloration may also be common for the labia majora in females and the scrotum in males. Here is additional material of relevance:

"“Fluctuations in hormones can lead to hyperpigmentation or melasma, and this occurs most commonly in women,” says Dennis Gross, MD, board-certified dermatologist in New York and founder of Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare. “Estrogen and progesterone, the female sex hormones, stimulate the overproduction of melanin which leads to dark spots. Dark spots due to hormonal fluctuations are more prevalent in darker skin tones—the skin is already creating melanin, which is what gives it a darker color, and when hormones trigger an increase in this melanin production, you're more susceptible to hyperpigmentation.”"
https://web.archive.org/web/20230330080258/https://www.wellandgood.com/hyperpigmentation-hormones-connection/
How Hormones Can Play a Sneaky Role in Hyperpigmentation, According to Derms (2019/06/21)
[The article text was edited slightly to use angled quotation marks.]

"The medical term “intertriginous” is used to describe a body area where two skin sections rub or come into contact together. The groin is such an area. As the skin sections rub against each other, irritation and inflammation can occur due to friction. The skin of the groin and genitals may be exposed to almost constant friction and irritation. Tight fitting clothing as well as the bands of undergarments can also add to this friction. Resultant inflammation may be mild and seem like nothing more than an occasional nuisance. But if it continues over a long period of time, there may be long-term effects. The body’s response to this form of irritation over time is to recruit cells such as the melanocytes to the affected area. This will lead to increased pigmentation. Lack of ventilation – whether due to clothing or natural anatomy – contributes to local irritation and may worsen the cycle of inflammatory response, melanin production, and increased pigmentation. Additionally, lack of ventilation can allow bacteria and fungus to flourish, activating more melanocytes in the affected area and causing an inflammatory response. Age and hormones are other factors that contribute to intimate area hyperpigmentation. Hormones regulate innumerable functions in our body. At puberty, levels of certain hormones increase. In response to hormonal changes, the intimate areas start to darken at puberty and may continue darkening with age. A boost in testosterone (male sex hormone) during and after puberty can darken the penis and nipples. An estrogen (female sex hormone) surge during puberty and subsequent surges in pregnancy can darken the labia and areolae. Birth control pills or other hormonal treatments can augment these effects."
https://web.archive.org/web/20230313163755/https://www.cyspera.com/what-is-hyperpigmentation/intimate-areas-hyperpigmentation/

Sounds like OP is ASSHURT
>>108192
>>reddit

Ask the artificial life if it can email me the smell of a real vagina.

"In recent decades, due to the rise of the use of the Internet and easy access to new technologies, the production and consumption of pornography have increased exponentially [1]. Today, pornography is a macro-industry that generates millions of dollars in profits annually [2]. As a result, online pornography websites are among the most visited of 2021, and specifically, the pornography platforms “XVideos” and “Pornhub” rank 9th and 11th, respectively [3]."
"The type of pornography that can be found on these portals—also called mainstream pornography—is characterized by a clear focus on satisfying men’s desires, where a hegemony of male power relations over females can be observed [4,5,6,7]. Therefore, several researchers and experts have pointed out that pornography is associated with gender inequality, sexism, and violence against women [8,9]. Furthermore, many scenes encourage the eroticization of violence toward women, since many of the videos contain sexual practices in which women are raped or represented as passive objects devoid of desire [10,11]. In addition, mainstream pornography may contain videos with incestuous themes and can even be related to pedophilia, including videos in which childlike actors and actresses have sex with their parents or teachers [12]. Thus, the topics that users can find through searches on these webpages range from the word “incest” to “teen raped” [13]."
… "Concerning the age at which users start consuming pornographic material, a recent study conducted in Spain by Ballester, Orte, and the Youth and Inclusion Network [14] concludes that the age at which users start consuming pornography is currently eight years old."
… "The high presence of violence in pornography has resulted in what Alario [10] calls the “eroticization of violence against women”, which was categorized by the author into six types of eroticization perpetuated by the pornography industry: the eroticization of women’s physical pain, lack of desire, suffering, humiliation, sexual abuse of minors and the eroticization of prostitution."
… "Regarding the effects of pornography viewing, a meta-analysis by Weight et al. [17] found associations between watching pornography and violent behavior. According to this study, men who consume pornography are more likely to practice or desire dominant and degrading practices, such as gagging and choking. They also found that women who consume pornography are more likely to engage in or desire submissive practices. According to this meta-analysis, a longitudinal study among adolescents revealed that watching pornography is associated with sexually violent behavior across the lifespan."
"Analyzing University Students' Perceptions Regarding Mainstream Pornography and Its Link to SDG5." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022 Jul; 19(13): 8055. PMC9265877. doi:10.3390/ijerph19138055. Epub 2022 Jun 30.

hmmmm
How do you get past the accusations of kink shaming? You are, after all, probably hitting someone below the belt with all of this.
Furthermore. Would you consider presenting yourself as an asexual? Surely you understand that whatever deviation you present your survey against can be equally presented against what you would happen to enjoy sexually. So called facts against any sex in any shape or form can be plucked from anywhere on the internet.
If you however are an asexual people might have more of an understanding where you're coming from. It really is the only proper use of the asexual category.
No matter how finely tuned you can describe something as 'safe sex', STDs will always ruin the party for you.
In a way it's better to tell people you don't like lude things than trying to reason with people who are into that thing why it's bad.

>>108213
>so many instances of "you" and variants (your, yourself, you're)
Are people incapable of understanding what has been pointed out many times?
> kink shaming
From https://web.archive.org/web/20220730055004/https://voidchan.net/void/res/80036.html
> Moony Sweden 07/19/22 (Tue) 11:48:17 No.80426
> I suspect it's a kink shaming thread.
> Anonymous Canada 07/19/22 (Tue) 23:59:45 No.80436 [Responding to 80426]
> 1. This is about neither kink shaming nor proving that someone's urge is "wrong."
> 2. Are you suggesting people should be able to get away with any behavior if it's labeled as a "kink?"

> "Certain BDSM sexual practices can be and sometimes are prosecuted under state criminal laws dealing with assault, aggravated assault, sexual assault or sexual abuse. This is true even when there is clear consent. Criminal prosecution can arise in various circumstances, including situations in which one participant is injured requiring medical treatment and the injury is brought to the attention of the police by hospital staff, doctors or a family member."
> https://web.archive.org/web/20220410212058/https://pridelegal.com/assault-consent-bdsm-law/
From my recap:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220730055004/https://voidchan.net/void/res/80036.html#80842
> There are, or most certainly should be, criminal implications for people who perpetrate anorectal violence against one or more others. Furthermore, various factors on their own or combined can in some regions (and anywhere else definitely should) invalidate consent from a legal perspective; these include the possibility or actual result of serious injury, use of a strong mind-altering drug, and the presence of a significant mental disorder such as a severe case of sexual masochism disorder.
See also the "criminal justice" image posted in >>107854.

>>108209
> The type of pornography that can be found on these portals—also called mainstream pornography—is characterized by a clear focus on satisfying men’s desires, where a hegemony of male power relations over females can be observed [4,5,6,7]. Therefore, several researchers and experts have pointed out that pornography is associated with gender inequality, sexism, and violence against women [8,9]. Furthermore, many scenes encourage the eroticization of violence toward women, since many of the videos contain sexual practices in which women are raped or represented as passive objects devoid of desire [10,11].
> "Analyzing University Students' Perceptions Regarding Mainstream Pornography and Its Link to SDG5." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022 Jul; 19(13): 8055. PMC9265877. doi:10.3390/ijerph19138055. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
>>108223
> various factors on their own or combined can in some regions (and anywhere else definitely should) invalidate consent from a legal perspective; these include the possibility or actual result of serious injury, use of a strong mind-altering drug, and the presence of a significant mental disorder such as a severe case of sexual masochism disorder.
That _may be_ (better be, because otherwise it's rather tough to believe) what is meant by the source(s) referenced by the study quoted above (10 and/or 11, one of which may not be written in English): rape in the sense of consent being rendered invalid and consequently illegal due to the possibility or actual result of serious injury, among other consent-invalidating factors. Related:

"‘We just really like to be adventurous with our sexuality.’ Legally, though, people can’t consent to just anything. “There’s an important body of law that declares it illegal to consent to certain types of physical harm, whether it’s sexual or not,” said Wendy Murphy, a professor of sexual violence law at New England School of Law. “You can’t consent to torture. You cannot consent to serious bodily injury.”"
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/23/style/bdsm-kink-consent.html
The Boundary Between Abuse and B.D.S.M.
[The article text was edited slightly to condense what was quoted into a single paragraph.]

>>108223
I'll take your word for it but there are so many people out to get someone on chans. If the kink isn't juicy enough the assailant might try to demonize whatever kink the victim has.

I feel like I am on Reddit.

>>108233
Downvoted
>>107853
> >Reddit /r/painal
> Other subreddits which obviously violate Reddit's policy* regarding violent content yet strangely still [as of 2023/05/15] persist nonetheless: /r/Roughanal /r/DegradingHoles /r/analfisting
On a more serious note, /r/analfisting was banned recently — NOT due to being in violation of Reddit's policy on violent content, but rather "due to being unmoderated."

As noted in the "fi" (fecal incontinence) paste in the OP image: "Stretching the anal canal with girthy insertions is likely to disrupt or fragment one or both anal sphincter muscles, possibly without pain as the internal anal sphincter muscle also lacks somatic innervation. Such damage results in permanent muscle weakening and is associated with FI especially with a damaged or dysfunctional puborectalis muscle. Stretching the anal canal repeatedly with insertions of progressively increasing circumference may cause cumulative muscle damage."

There are many studies included in the references compilation (comprised of T&A, A&T, AR1-3, and P&I) pointing out that anal dilatation/stretching is likely to permanently damage one or both anal sphincter muscles at the least. This is because it used to be an accepted treatment for anal fissure, but has fallen out of favor due to unacceptably high rates of fecal incontinence owing to muscular damage demonstrated by anal endosonography.

Anal fisting undeniably constitutes violence (i.e., injurious behavior) for any receptive person with intact anal sphincter muscles.

>>108276
you should come to catchan .pk bro i think your message would be well received